“France stands out with recycling rates that are significantly lower than its European neighbors”, notes the UFC-Que Choisir, deploring that “The entrepreneurs [soient] very unscrupulous about recyclability ”. This remark is made on the finish of an evaluation of the recyclability and efficient recycling of a number of merchandise extensively out there on this planet carried out collectively by eight shopper associations in Australia, Brazil, France and Hong-Kong. , India, Malaysia, New Zealand, Portugal and the United Kingdom.
In this case, the affiliation denounces the poor French outcomes when it comes to plastic recycling. “France comes in penultimate place in the ranking [européen] with [un taux de recyclage des emballages plastique] by only 26.4% “, she explains, specifying that this price reaches 42% in Portugal and 44% within the United Kingdom. In query ? The “Too low recycling capacities [des plastiques en France] “ that don’t enable all of the recyclable plastics collected to be recycled.
The examine “Shows that on average 35% of the total weight of each packaging of tested product will not be recycled”, explains UFC-Que Choisir, specifying that this “Poor performance reached 39% in France”.
For the shoppers’ affiliation, the issue additionally comes from producers who “Do not hesitate to place in the marketplace packaging that cannot be recycled “. And to quote multi-material packaging, akin to metallized plastic movies for cat meals baggage from a well-known model and cardboard tubes lined with aluminum, with a metallic backside and sealed with a plastic cap of no much less well-known model of crisps. The former aren’t recycled in six of the 9 nations studied (together with France), and the latter aren’t recycled in any nation studied.
Worse, believes the affiliation, “In all markets, manufacturers remain fond of plastic to package their products, in defiance of more virtuous alternatives”. And to specify that the eleven merchandise of the French basket all included at the very least one plastic half.
Added to that is ” a multiplicity of logos which only increase the confusion ”. And to deplore the confusion between the sorting instructions (too rarely present on the packaging), the “Tidy Man” (which reminds that waste should not be thrown on the public highway) and the “Green level” (which signifies that ‘an eco-contribution was paid for the packaging).
Plastic packaging: the 3R decree is in consultation (article published on 12/29/2020) Reduction. Reuse. Recycling. The so-called “3R” draft decree is in public consultation until January 12th. It sets targets for plastic packaging for the next five years (2021-2025). And in particular an o …
Circular economy law: the State wants to standardize the marking of products subject to sorting instructions (article published on 09/09/2019) The display of sorting instructions for the waste generated by the products is disparate, incomplete and difficult to control. The State therefore wants to clean up the various logos and impose a uniform marking.
Article revealed on April 22, 2021