The Federal Union of Consumers – Que Choisir printed, on May 20, a research which takes inventory of the present market regulation, wherein it denounces a “price explosion”. The affiliation is subsequently asking for a moratorium on the EDF restructuring challenge in addition to the institution of a public debate regarding the upkeep of a regulated gross sales tariff. Explanations.
A tariff explosion
In a research printed on May 20, UFC-Que Choisir explains that the regulated tariff for the sale of electrical energy (TVR) “ has extended an nearly steady inflation dynamic since 2010 », Tariff which elevated by practically 2% on February 1, 2021, thus strongly affecting the buying energy of shoppers. Indeed, a mean family heated with electrical energy by TRV would have seen their invoice drop from € 1,019 to € 1,522 between 2010 and 2020.
Taxation is the principle reason behind this value explosion in response to the research by UFC-Que Choisir, which emphasizes that “ the duty-free rate of the TRV has increased by 40% in 10 years, a figure more than three times higher than inflation over the period (12.4%)! “. In addition, the regulation of nuclear energy by way of the ARENH system would have pushed the costs of each TRV and market presents to extend and subsequently to succeed in shoppers. It ought to be famous that this technique permits suppliers to buy electrical energy produced by EDF nuclear energy vegetation, at a regulated value.
EDF and entry to nuclear energy
In this spirit, the patron group asks the federal government “The immediate lifting of the ceiling on the volumes of ARENH accessible by alternative suppliers, to put a stop to the current inflationary spiral “, as a result of “ the situation is worrying », According to What to Choose. Indeed, in the draft new nuclear regulation, the absence of mention of the TRV shows that its maintenance is ” strongly threatened “. It subsequently calls for a moratorium on this reform.
The affiliation certainly fears sharp value will increase and denounces EDF’s want to extend it by 26.4% with the intention to compensate for sure monetary drifts, alluding to the development of the Flamanville EPR.
A transparency that ought to nonetheless be made on the actual prices of electrical energy manufacturing, in response to the UFC. ” The authorities, EDF and the European Commission however take the celebration to barter within the shadows the contours of the longer term group of the market, as a part of the challenge to reorganize EDF’s actions and thus wish to impose it on everybody! She says.
Marie Gerald
Photo from Une: © AdobeStock
