Before getting alarmed by seeing the assigned coloration and the accompanying commentary, it’s higher to begin by studying the methodology of the research situated beneath the interactive map of the UFC-What to choose. A hyperlink to the website of the Ministry of Health permits you to refine the outcomes.
Thus, greater than 75% of non-compliant analyzes between January 2019 and December 2020 qualify the water in the municipalities of Domgermain and Charmes-la-Côte as very dangerous, they inherit a black pellet on the map for his or her fluorine degree. .
Jean-Pierre Callais, president of SMETS (Mixed water association of South Toulois) is aware of it: “At the drilling of the Domgermain station, we are at the limit of the regulations with the fluorides which should not exceed 1.5 (mg / L)”.
Recommendations, no prohibitions
The newest month-to-month readings flirt with 1.6 whereas understanding “that the measuring tools have an accuracy of 10 to 15%”. “There is no impact on health, otherwise the ARS would have reported the problem and asked us to do what is necessary.”
The ministry’s web site solely reviews the “fluorides” parameter and offers suggestions reminiscent of “advise against the consumption of this water for children under 12”. It can also be advised to the relaxation of the inhabitants “to remove any fluoride intake other than tap water”.
Gibeaumeix seems beneath a purple dot which corresponds to 50 to 75% of non-compliant readings. On the ministry’s web site, the month-to-month parameters are inexperienced with the following indication: “Feed water complies with the quality requirements in force for all the parameters measured” since the assertion of February 25, 2019.
As for the association’s website , it evokes the presence of bromates. A state of affairs that annoys the mayor, Denis Kieffer: “The situation was occasional, it dates back more than a year. We were reaching the end of a batch of chlorine put in the water ”.
Gibeaumeix ought to seem in inexperienced
The mayor would now not like to seem in purple on the UFC-What to choose map. Indeed, in accordance to the methodology, its municipality ought to be indicated by a inexperienced dot (lower than 5% of non-compliant analyzes).
The environmental supervisor of the affiliation, André Ensminger, invitations you to refer to the methodology and to the reviews of the ARS: “It is an average, the map does not mean that the water is systematically bad, it does not hold up. has recent improvements ”.
For Domgermain, “the parameters are little or no non-compliant, lower than 10% in worth”. All the data of the ARS had been processed by pc at the nationwide degree. There is not any clarification for Gibeaumeix which deserves a greater classification.